Call Tucker Law Today! Toll Free 1-800-TUCKERWINS
FacebookXInstagramYouTube

BLOG

Achieving Zero Comparative Fault in Premises Liability Cases

The defendant in a premises liability case can try to claim that the plaintiff contributed to the accident in some way. Comparative liability is what this is, and it can lower the amount of compensation the plaintiff is legally entitled to. It's crucial to realize that the onus of showing comparative fault rests with the defendant. The defense must present proof that the plaintiff contributed to the accident in some way. This proof, which must prove that the plaintiff's actions or inactions contributed to the accident and the subsequent injuries, must be by the greater weight of the evidence. The plaintiff will be entitled to full compensation for their injuries and losses, without any reduction for their own responsibility, if the defendant is unable to establish comparative culpability. To get 0% comparative culpability in a premises liability case, try the following tactics: Collect evidence: Collecting evidence can help prove the defendant's negligence and the plaintiff's innocence. Examples of evidence include photos, videos, and eyewitness testimony. To prove the defendant's liability for the accident and the plaintiff's lack of culpability, you should seek expert testimony, such as that of an expert in accident reconstruction or safety. Establish the defendant's negligence and the plaintiff's lack of fault by demonstrating the defendant's duty of care, for example by producing proof of the building rules or safety regulations that the defendant disregarded. Highlight the plaintiff's actions: Highlighting the plaintiff's actions can help to show that the plaintiff is not at fault. One way to do this is by providing proof of the precautions the plaintiff took to avoid the accident. With years of expertise with premises liability cases, our accident lawyer at Tucker Law will work directly with you [...]

By |2023-03-15T04:50:23-04:00March 7th, 2023|Personal Injury|Comments Off on Achieving Zero Comparative Fault in Premises Liability Cases
Read More

Strategies for Overcoming the “Subjective Injury” Defense in Personal Injury Cases

In personal injury disputes, the "subjective injury" defense is a frequent tactic employed by defendants to contest the severity of the plaintiff's injuries. This argument argues that the plaintiff is simply exaggerating the severity of their ailments for financial benefit and that the plaintiff's injuries are subjective and cannot be reliably established. It might be difficult to overcome the subjective injury defense, but there are a number of tactics that can be employed to do so and establish the full degree of your ailments. Some of the best tactics are listed below: Medical records: The plaintiff's medical records are among the most crucial pieces of evidence in a personal injury case. These documents can be used to determine the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and can offer conclusive proof of the plaintiff's pain and suffering. Expert testimony: In some circumstances, it may be necessary to use expert testimony to determine the severity of the plaintiff's injuries. An objective assessment of the plaintiff's injuries and how they have affected her life can be made by an expert witness, such as a physician or physical therapist. Visual evidence, including as images and films, can aid to demonstrate the severity of the plaintiff's injuries and how they have affected his or her capacity to carry out daily tasks. Eyewitness testimony: Eyewitness testimony can give important information about the plaintiff's injuries and how they have affected her life. Eyewitnesses who have observed the plaintiff's condition and the challenges they have encountered as a result of their injuries, such as acquaintances, family members, and coworkers, can testify in court. Diaries and journals: Documenting your symptoms and how your injuries have affected your daily life in a diary or journal might [...]

By |2023-03-15T04:50:20-04:00March 6th, 2023|Civil Litigation, Personal Injury|Comments Off on Strategies for Overcoming the “Subjective Injury” Defense in Personal Injury Cases
Read More

Be Prepared for the HINTING DEFENSE: The One Deposition Question You’ll Always Get

Depositions are a significant component of the discovery process in a personal injury case. A witness is sworn in and questioned about the circumstances of the case while under oath during a deposition. The lawyer for the opposing party often conducts depositions, and the responses given can be used as evidence in court. The "hinting" question is one that you can almost always anticipate being asked during a deposition. Instead than requesting a certain response directly, this question is meant to imply it. In an effort to induce the witness to say anything that can be used against them in court, the defense frequently employs the suggestive question. For instance, the lawyer can inquire, "You felt fairly exhausted on the day of the accident, didn't you?" Even though the witness doesn't express it explicitly, this inquiry suggests that the witness was exhausted. It's crucial to be ready for the hinting question and know how to successfully answer to it. Here are some pointers for handling the hinting issue: Listen closely: Make sure you comprehend the query and the attorney's underlying argument. Don't assume anything: Even if you believe the idea in the question to be genuine, don't agree with it. Focus on the facts: Don't hypothesize or make educated guesses; simply respond to what you know to be true. Be precise: Avoid responding with a question; instead, make sure your response is precise and succinct. A skilled accident lawyer at Tucker Law representing you will have a great deal of expertise taking depositions and managing the suggestive question. As we work together to defend your rights and interests throughout the process and to get you ready for your deposition, we will be in close communication [...]

By |2023-03-15T04:50:10-04:00March 5th, 2023|Civil Litigation, Personal Injury|Comments Off on Be Prepared for the HINTING DEFENSE: The One Deposition Question You’ll Always Get
Read More

Navigating the Discovery Phase of a Wrongful Death Case in Florida

In Florida, the discovery stage of a wrongful death case is crucial to the court procedure. Both parties are able to acquire and exchange data and proof that will be utilized in court during this phase. The outcome of a wrongful death case can depend on how well the discovery phase is understood, therefore consulting with a skilled accident lawyer is critical. Following the filing of a complaint, the discovery phase usually starts and can run for several months. Both parties will have the chance to make document requests, take depositions, and gather additional evidence that will be used in court during this time. The purpose of the discovery phase is to give both parties a thorough understanding of the case's facts and to pinpoint any areas of contention that might need to be settled through additional research or discussion. The discovery stage might be crucial for the plaintiff in a wrongful death case. Because the plaintiff is required to demonstrate that the defendant's conduct were the specific reason the victim died, The plaintiff has the chance to collect evidence during the discovery process to support their claims, including medical records, eyewitness statements, and other pertinent data. Our skilled accident lawyer at Tucker Law will collaborate closely with you to make sure that all pertinent data is acquired and used effectively in court. Additionally, we will fight to uphold your rights and interests all the way through the discovery process and beyond to make sure you get the financial compensation you are due for your loss. Evidence is vital in wrongful death cases because it helps prove who was at fault for the victim's death. This is why it's crucial to consult with a knowledgeable [...]

By |2023-03-15T04:49:57-04:00March 4th, 2023|Personal Injury, Wrongful Death|Comments Off on Navigating the Discovery Phase of a Wrongful Death Case in Florida
Read More

Can Dash Cam Footage Be Used as Evidence in Court?

In the aftermath of a car accident, dash cam footage can be extremely useful. It can reveal what happened before and during the collision, providing insight into fault and liability. The question remains, however, whether dashcam footage can be used as evidence in court. Yes, dashcam footage can be used as evidence in court, but it depends on the facts of each case. Dashcam footage must meet certain criteria in order to be admissible in court, including relevance, authenticity, and reliability. In addition, the footage must not be altered or edited in any way that compromises its authenticity or accuracy. Dash cam footage can be used to establish fault and liability for a car accident in a personal injury case. The video evidence can be used to support or refute claims made by the parties involved. It can also be used to refute false or exaggerated claims and to support witness testimony. Dash camera footage doesn't care about your driving record. In fact, it can completely overcome issues of a history of bad driving when negotiating with insurance adjusters. It's important to remember, however, that dashcam footage is only one type of evidence that can be used in a personal injury case. There are plenty of other tips to consider when in a car accident.  Other evidence, such as witness testimony, medical records, and police reports, can also be used to determine fault and liability. Admitting video footage in court is a multi-step process that ensures the footage meets the admissibility criteria. The procedure varies by jurisdiction, but the following steps are common: The first step in admitting video footage in court is determining its relevance to the case. The footage is relevant if it [...]

By |2023-03-15T04:49:55-04:00March 3rd, 2023|Car Accident, Personal Injury|Comments Off on Can Dash Cam Footage Be Used as Evidence in Court?
Read More
Go to Top