Call Tucker Law Today! Toll Free 1-800-TUCKERWINS
FacebookXInstagramYouTube

BLOG

The Impact of Your Driving Record on Your Injury Claim

It's critical for drivers to comprehend how their driving history may influence their injury claims in the event of an accident. A skilled accident attorney at Tucker Law have a wealth of expertise representing clients in a variety of personal injury matters, and we are knowledgeable about the subtleties of how driving histories might affect a claim. The insurance company will probably look at your driving history as part of their inquiry when you submit an injury claim and see if you are an alert driver. This is due to the fact that your driving history can reveal crucial details about your driving habits and experience, which may affect the value of your claim. For instance, the insurance provider can contend that you contributed to the accident and that your claim should be lowered if you have a history of careless driving or falling asleep a the wheel. However, if you have a spotless driving record, the insurance provider might be more inclined to provide you with reasonable compensation for your injuries. This is due to the fact that your driving history shows that you are an accountable driver and are thus less likely to be to blame for an accident. It's crucial to remember that the insurance company might still look for ways to lower the amount of your claim even if you have a spotless driving record. This is why you need a skilled accident lawyer on your side to guide you through the convoluted claims procedure and fight for the just compensation you are entitled to. It's crucial to remember that any traffic infraction, no matter how little, might affect your injury claim. The insurance provider can assert that you were negligent [...]

By |2023-01-26T10:37:32-05:00February 10th, 2023|Car Accident, Personal Injury|Comments Off on The Impact of Your Driving Record on Your Injury Claim
Read More

Understanding Liability in Shopping Center Exit Accidents

In order to prevent car accidents, it is crucial for drivers to use caution and adhere to the traffic laws when leaving a shopping mall. Even with the greatest of intentions, mishaps can still occur. It can be difficult to determine who is at fault in these kinds of incidents, which is why it's crucial to consult with a qualified accident lawyer. Whether or whether the driver was obeying the traffic laws is a crucial consideration in deciding who is at fault in a collision at a shopping center exit. This entails observing posted speed limits as well as traffic signals like stop signs and traffic lights. Drivers must also be aware of their surroundings and keep an eye out for other cars, bicycles, and pedestrians. If this isn't done, there could be serious collisions and the driver might be held accountable. The state of the exit from the retail mall itself is a significant consideration when determining culpability. Drivers may be put in danger if the exit is inadequately constructed or maintained. In these situations, the mall may be held accountable for the accident. It is crucial to realize that every accident is different and that a variety of factors might affect who is legally liable. You can work with an accomplished accident lawyer to develop a compelling case while also getting assistance in understanding your rights and alternatives. Call 1-800-TuckerWins to speak with a knowledgeable accident attorney at Tucker Law if you or a loved one has been hurt in a collision near a shopping center exit. We'll battle to get you the compensation you're due while assisting you in understanding your options and rights.

By |2023-01-26T10:14:51-05:00February 10th, 2023|Car Accident, Personal Injury|Comments Off on Understanding Liability in Shopping Center Exit Accidents
Read More

Two Car Accidents in Quick Succession: What You Need to Know

You may be wondering what a car accident attorney would say on how a second accident will affect your first car accident case. Speaking to an accident attroney at Tucker Law is always the best route after a crash. First, it's important to understand that each car accident is treated as a separate legal case. This means that if you've been involved in two separate accidents, you will have two separate cases. However, there are a few ways that the second accident may affect your first case. One potential impact is on your credibility as a witness. If you were at fault in the second accident, it may be used against you in the first case to challenge your testimony or cast doubt on your version of events. On the other hand, if you were not at fault in the second accident, it may not have any impact on your first case.a Another potential impact is on your ability to recover damages. If you were already awarded damages in the first case, the second accident may not affect your ability to collect those damages. However, when you are still in the process of pursuing damages in the first case, it may be more difficult to prove that the injuries or damages you sustained were a result of the first accident as opposed to the second crash. In this situation, but really all car crashes, it's important to seek the advice of a qualified personal injury attorney who can help you navigate the legal process. It's important to note that each case is unique and the impact of a second accident will depend on the specific circumstances of your situation. If you have questions about how [...]

By |2023-01-11T20:39:14-05:00February 9th, 2023|Car Accident, Personal Injury|Comments Off on Two Car Accidents in Quick Succession: What You Need to Know
Read More

Understanding the Three Steps of Conducting a Thorough Patent Search

The examiner of a patent application is required to perform a thorough search of the prior art, whereas a patent attorney is not required to perform a search. Finding the search field, choosing the right search tools, and figuring out the best search technique for each tool are the three key elements in this procedure. Domestic patents (including publications of patent applications), international patent documents, and nonpatent literature must all be included in the search box (NPL). No source may be excluded from the search unless the examiner has a good basis to do so and has no reason to believe that there will be further relevant references in that source. Both the claimed subject matter and any aspects that might be logically anticipated to be claimed should be included in the search. The examiner must take into account the coverage, strengths, and weaknesses of the available search tools appropriate for their chosen field while deciding which search tools to utilize. Each examiner's unique demands will determine the search techniques they use, with examiners in highly busy, high-technology fields—where patent documentation might not keep up with invention—getting special consideration. To ensure a thorough search under these circumstances, NPL and specific search tools may be required. Automated search solutions frequently include both text and categorized search functionality, with a combination of both being required in the majority of technologies. However, it can be difficult to effectively explain search demands in textual words, particularly in mechanical arts. In certain situations, it could be essential to use broader text terms or to browse all patent documents inside one or more classifications. Each case must be evaluated individually to establish the best search method for the tool(s) used, with [...]

By |2023-02-04T20:03:09-05:00February 8th, 2023|Patents|Comments Off on Understanding the Three Steps of Conducting a Thorough Patent Search
Read More

The USPTO’s Process for a Timely Amendment to Allege Use

If you've filed an amendment to allege use for your trademark application, but the mark was published for opposition before the amendment was examined, you may be wondering what steps the USPTO will take next. According to the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) §1104.04, the examining attorney will contact you (or your trademark attorney) by telephone or email and give you the option to withdraw the amendment. If you decide to withdraw the amendment, the examining attorney will advise you that a notice of allowance will be issued if the application is not opposed, and you'll need to file a statement of use or request an extension of time to file a statement of use within six months of the notice. You also have the option of requesting that the USPTO treat the amendment to allege use as a statement of use, which must be done within six months of the notice of allowance using the TEAS Post-Publication Amendment form. If you don't file a statement of use, request an extension, or request to treat the amendment as a statement of use within six months of the notice of allowance, your application will be abandoned. On the other hand, if you elect not to withdraw the amendment to allege use, the examining attorney will take one of two actions: If no notice of allowance has been issued, the examining attorney will withdraw the application from publication and examine the amendment to allege use. If a notice of allowance has already been issued, the ITU/Divisional Unit will cancel the notice and the examining attorney will examine the amendment to allege use. If the amendment to allege use can be approved after examination, the mark must [...]

By |2023-01-11T20:39:06-05:00February 8th, 2023|Trademarks|Comments Off on The USPTO’s Process for a Timely Amendment to Allege Use
Read More
Go to Top