Trademarks

Navigating the Maze: Understanding Trademark Infringement and Fair Use

Trademark Infringement: The Basics To the untrained eye, trademark infringement might seem straightforward, but it's a complex area of law. Trademark infringement happens when one party uses a trademark identical or closely similar to a trademark owned by another party in a way that can cause confusion about the origin of goods or services. Several factors come into play when determining infringement, such as the similarity of the marks, the relatedness of the goods/services, and the channels of trade and advertising. Fair Use: A Double-Edged Sword The concept of 'fair use' is another intriguing facet of trademark law. It refers to the limited use of a protected trademark without needing the owner's permission. Fair use is categorized into two types: descriptive and nominative. Descriptive fair use lets someone use a trademark to describe their own products, while nominative fair use allows someone to use a trademark to point to the trademark owner's actual goods or services—for example, for comparative advertising, criticism, or parody. However, pinpointing whether a specific case falls under fair use often mandates meticulous legal scrutiny. Trademark Dilution: Guarding Fame Another layer of complexity is added by trademark dilution. This happens when a third party uses a famous trademark in a way that could diminish its uniqueness or tarnish its reputation, even if there's no likelihood of confusion. International Trademark Law: A Global Challenge The complexities of trademark law go beyond national boundaries. Different countries have different rules and procedures for registering and protecting trademarks. Understanding how to shield a trademark on an international scale can be a formidable task. Online Trademark Issues: The Digital Frontier Finally, with the digital revolution, a new set of complications related to trademarks has arisen. Issues related [...]

By |2023-04-28T11:48:54-04:00April 28th, 2023|Trademarks|Comments Off on Navigating the Maze: Understanding Trademark Infringement and Fair Use

Tracking Your Trademark Status with the USPTO

Are you aware of the responsibilities you have as an applicant or registrant? When it comes to tracking the status of your trademark matter with the USPTO, it is a must. Have you read 37 C.F.R. §2.23(d)? Probably not. And if you don't find this articl exciting, you probably need to hire a trademark attorney to help you through the process because ultimately it is your responsibility to stay on top of the time frames and ensure that you have received all necessary notices and actions. If you have not received any communications, it is important that you promptly and regularly check the status of your matter. It's important to note that failure to act diligently and follow up with appropriate action may result in denial of your application. To help you stay on top of your trademark status, the USPTO provides the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) database, as well as telephone assistance and status checks with the TAC. 37 C.F.R. §2.23 is a section of the Code of Federal Regulations that pertains to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Specifically, it outlines the time frames and requirements for communication between the USPTO and applicants or registrants regarding the status of their trademark matter. Subsection (d) of this regulation states that applicants and registrants are responsible for tracking the status of their trademark matter. It is your responsiblity to ensure that you have received all necessary notices and actions from the USPTO. The USPTO also provides various resources for applicants and registrants to check the status of their trademark matter, such as the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) database and telephone assistance from the TAC. It's recommended to consult TMEP [...]

By |2023-03-15T04:45:33-04:00February 25th, 2023|Trademarks|Comments Off on Tracking Your Trademark Status with the USPTO

Understanding Ownership Requirements for Extension Requests in Trademark Applications

When it comes to filing an extension request for a trademark application, it is important to ensure that you are the legitimate owner of the mark. This is complicated and usually requires detailed conversations with an experienced trademark attorney.  According to 15 U.S.C. §1051(d)(2) and 37 C.F.R. §2.89(a)(3), (b)(3), the party filing the extension request must be the owner of the application at the time of filing. This means that you must have the right to use or exercise control over the use of the mark. If you are not the owner of record, your extension request should include either a statement that the assignment or other document of title has been recorded (or is in the process of being recorded) in the Assignment Recordation Branch of the USPTO, or other evidence that you are the owner of the application in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §3.71(d) and §3.73(b). If the extension request is filed by someone other than the owner of record and does not include the necessary evidence of ownership, the USPTO will issue an Office action denying the request. If the party who filed the extension request was the owner at the time of filing, you may be able to submit evidence to establish the chain of title after the statutory filing period has expired, within the time provided in the Office action advising you of the denial. To establish ownership, you must either record an assignment or other document of title with the Assignment Recordation Branch and state in your response to the Office action that the document has been recorded, or submit other evidence of ownership in the form of a document transferring ownership from one party to another or an [...]

By |2023-01-11T20:49:04-05:00February 14th, 2023|Trademarks|Comments Off on Understanding Ownership Requirements for Extension Requests in Trademark Applications

What You Need to Know About the Notice of Allowance in Trademark Applications

If your trademark attorney recently applied for a trademark, you may have heard about something called a "notice of allowance." But what exactly does this document mean for your trademark application? First, it's important to understand that a notice of allowance is only issued in certain circumstances. Specifically, it is issued if a §1(b) application (also known as an "intent-to-use" application) is published for opposition and is not successfully opposed. In other words, if someone else raises an objection to your trademark application, but the USPTO ultimately decides that your trademark can proceed, you will receive a notice of allowance. So what happens after you receive a notice of allowance? The most important thing to know is that the notice of allowance establishes the due date for filing a statement of use. This statement is essentially a formal declaration that you are actually using the trademark in commerce. In most cases, you will have six months from the date of the notice of allowance to file your statement of use. If you fail to file the statement of use within this timeframe, your trademark application will be abandoned. It's worth noting that the USPTO does not publish any notification in the Trademark Official Gazette that a notice of allowance has been issued. This means that you will have to keep track of the deadline for filing your statement of use on your own. If you believe that there are errors in the notice of allowance, or if you think that the notice of allowance was issued in error (for example, if you've already received approval for an amendment to allege use), it's important to contact the ITU/Divisional Unit immediately. You can find the current telephone [...]

By |2023-01-11T20:43:48-05:00February 13th, 2023|Trademarks|Comments Off on What You Need to Know About the Notice of Allowance in Trademark Applications

Requirements for a Complete Amendment to Allege Use of Trademarks, Collective Marks, and Certification Marks

It's important to understand that an amendment to allege use is a request to change the basis of your trademark application from intent-to-use to actual use. This means that you are now asserting that you have already used the mark in commerce in connection with the goods or services specified in your application. To support this assertion, you will need your trademark attorney to provide a properly signed verification or declaration stating that you are the owner of the mark, the mark is in use in commerce, and the dates of first use of the mark anywhere and in commerce. The verification or declaration should also specify the goods or services specified in the application on or in connection with which the mark is in use in commerce. It's worth noting that only certain individuals are authorized to sign a verification or declaration, so be sure to consult TMEP §611.03(a) for more information on who may sign. If you're seeking to amend your trademark, collective mark, or certification mark to allege use, there are certain requirements that must be met in order to have your amendment be considered complete. These requirements are outlined in 37 C.F.R. §2.76(b). In addition to the verification or declaration, you will also need to provide one specimen per class of the mark as used in commerce that meets the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.56. A specimen is a sample of how you are using the mark in commerce, such as a label or packaging for the goods, or a display of the mark in connection with the services. It's important to make sure that your specimen clearly shows the mark being used in association with the goods or services specified [...]

By |2023-01-11T20:42:39-05:00February 11th, 2023|Trademarks|Comments Off on Requirements for a Complete Amendment to Allege Use of Trademarks, Collective Marks, and Certification Marks
Go to Top